What the Court held
Why it matters
The decision is useful in public-law challenges where the complaint is not simply that an administrative decision was unwise, but that public power was exercised opaquely, arbitrarily or in a manner that undermines institutional confidence.
Practice note
Judicial review examines legality and constitutional standards, not the court’s preferred policy choice. The pleaded record must identify the public-law defect with precision.
Judgment source
The source below is provided so the proposition, factual context and operative directions can be checked against the judgment before professional reliance.
This Insight is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for the judgment text or advice on specific facts.